<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Eugenia&#039;s Rants and Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:13:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pitchblend&#8217;s &#8220;Celsius&#8221; music video</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/04/pitchblends-celsius-music-video/</link>
		<comments>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/04/pitchblends-celsius-music-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eugenia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filmmaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/?p=3925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another great music video shot with the HV20 by Rich Savage. There are now about 300 *official* music videos shot with the HV series. Mighty impressive for a $500 camera. This is the camera that has put great quality and features to the hands of people who wanted to play with video seriously, but didn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great music video shot with the HV20 by Rich Savage. There are now <a href="http://vimeo.com/groups/hvmusic">about 300</a> *official* music videos shot with the HV series. Mighty impressive for a $500 camera. This is the camera that has put great quality and features to the hands of people who wanted to play with video seriously, but didn&#8217;t have the big bucks. The HV series has really turned the tide for filmmaking helping new filmmakers out.</p>
<p><center><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="512" height="288" data="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5448898&amp;server=www.vimeo.com&amp;fullscreen=1&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=ff9933"><param name="quality" value="best" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="scale" value="showAll" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5448898&amp;server=www.vimeo.com&amp;fullscreen=1&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=ff9933" /></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/04/pitchblends-celsius-music-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daily Twitter Update for 2009-07-04</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/04/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-07-04/</link>
		<comments>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/04/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-07-04/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eugenia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/04/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-07-04/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
@thomholwerda Does he wear a collar? in reply to thomholwerda #
@David_Newman Hey David, have a look if you have time: http://bit.ly/15O4tC in reply to David_Newman #
@EricFontaine Not useful for people like me. By the time my own machine has dealt with the color grading, and exported, why use this? in reply to EricFontaine #
@Kroc I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="aktt_tweet_digest">
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/thomholwerda">thomholwerda</a> Does he wear a collar? <a href="http://twitter.com/thomholwerda/statuses/2464924431">in reply to thomholwerda</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2466388490">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/David_Newman">David_Newman</a> Hey David, have a look if you have time: <a href="http://bit.ly/15O4tC" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/15O4tC</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/David_Newman/statuses/2458559601">in reply to David_Newman</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2459241778">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/EricFontaine">EricFontaine</a> Not useful for people like me. By the time my own machine has dealt with the color grading, and exported, why use this? <a href="http://twitter.com/EricFontaine/statuses/2453961211">in reply to EricFontaine</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2458660290">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc">Kroc</a> I think you see it backwards. Maybe it&#39;s you who should realize the importance and spreadability of h.264. <a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc/statuses/2451365644">in reply to Kroc</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2458620330">#</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/04/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-07-04/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daily Twitter Update for 2009-07-03</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/03/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-07-03/</link>
		<comments>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/03/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-07-03/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eugenia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/03/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-07-03/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
@jbqueru shaved his beard tonight after 13 years, I couldn&#39;t recognize him. I had NEVER seen my husband without a beard before. He scared me #
@slewis I hate Flash sites too, all the bands are using it, and it pisses me off. Flash should be used only when it makes sense. in reply to slewis [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="aktt_tweet_digest">
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/jbqueru">jbqueru</a> shaved his beard tonight after 13 years, I couldn&#39;t recognize him. I had NEVER seen my husband without a beard before. He scared me <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2448874753">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/slewis">slewis</a> I hate Flash sites too, all the bands are using it, and it pisses me off. Flash should be used only when it makes sense. <a href="http://twitter.com/slewis/statuses/2447079246">in reply to slewis</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2447088579">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/jonobacon">jonobacon</a> Jono, 2.39 MB is 2,509,000 bytes. Is that acceptable for the ubuntu video competition? Or is it per byte I need to count? <a href="http://twitter.com/jonobacon/statuses/2446170392">in reply to jonobacon</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2446677116">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/jbqueru">jbqueru</a> I hope it involves sushi. <a href="http://twitter.com/jbqueru/statuses/2444970505">in reply to jbqueru</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2445028003">#</a></li>
<li>Just installed the Facebook IM protocol plugin on my Pidgin installation. I don&#39;t really use facebook much though. <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2444809968">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/dalasv">dalasv</a> This guy ain&#39;t happy about the vimeo changes <a href="http://twitter.com/reubal" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/reubal</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2443989538">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/dalasv">dalasv</a>  This guy ain&#39;t happy <a href="http://twitter.com/reubal" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/reubal</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2443984382">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/reubal">reubal</a> more discussion here <a href="http://bit.ly/qJOMC" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/qJOMC</a><br />
 @<a href="http://twitter.com/slewis">slewis</a> I don&#39;t like it much either. <a href="http://twitter.com/reubal/statuses/2443345255">in reply to reubal</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2443980810">#</a></li>
<li>I just heard Whitney Houston&#39;s brand new song. It&#39;s a very old fashioned &#39;80s song. This is not the kind of comeback she needed. <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2443509951">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/thomholwerda">thomholwerda</a> The Acer Aspire One can playback youtube videos just fine, as long as you don&#39;t run in flash storage. It can barely manage HD. <a href="http://twitter.com/thomholwerda/statuses/2443403076">in reply to thomholwerda</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2443426851">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc">Kroc</a> We keep talking with Adam/Thom about theora/flash btw, but you need to follow me for these replies to be visible to you. <a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc/statuses/2441047168">in reply to Kroc</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2443356944">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/thomholwerda">thomholwerda</a> In many ways, it&#39;s the Netscape plugin model to blame, not Adobe. Other *third party* plugins have the same problems. <a href="http://twitter.com/thomholwerda/statuses/2443285815">in reply to thomholwerda</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2443325960">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/thomholwerda">thomholwerda</a> Yes, Flash is not fully accelerated because it has to go through the browser&#39;s pipeline, there&#39;s no way around it for plugins. <a href="http://twitter.com/thomholwerda/statuses/2443285815">in reply to thomholwerda</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2443318146">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/thomholwerda">thomholwerda</a> It works well enough for me for VIDEO, thank you. I hate Flash sites too, but its video support works fine. <a href="http://twitter.com/thomholwerda/statuses/2443175285">in reply to thomholwerda</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2443248395">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/sethadam1">sethadam1</a> Theora can not surpass h.264. At least not without by walking on patents. <a href="http://twitter.com/sethadam1/statuses/2441815816">in reply to sethadam1</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2442017906">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/sethadam1">sethadam1</a> Stop calling me shortsighted. Theora is simply NOT a good codec, it has architectural problems. It can&#39;t be optimized a lot. <a href="http://twitter.com/sethadam1/statuses/2441606448">in reply to sethadam1</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2441766414">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/sethadam1">sethadam1</a> I have nothing against the &lt;video&gt; element, my problem is with Theora being inferior to h.264. <a href="http://twitter.com/sethadam1/statuses/2441237224">in reply to sethadam1</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2441423077">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc">Kroc</a> I have no problem with Flash, why would I? It works just fine. As for &lt;video&gt; doing more, it remains to be seen. <a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc/statuses/2440969059">in reply to Kroc</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2441146954">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc">Kroc</a>  The whole HTML5 video thing is mostly webmastering masturbation, nothing to do with videography. <a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc/statuses/2440786490">in reply to Kroc</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2440941875">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc">Kroc</a> As a videographer, I don&#39;t see what more I get than with Flash with its recent h.264 support, sorry. <a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc/statuses/2440786490">in reply to Kroc</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2440939297">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc">Kroc</a> Theora and BBC&#39;s codec simply say &quot;we don&#39;t know if we step on patents&quot;. But really, the field is a minefield. <a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc/statuses/2440687525">in reply to Kroc</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2440762147">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc">Kroc</a> I am afraid if you want to be realistic, you can&#39;t innovate in video encoding now, it&#39;s full of patents. Theora is not patent-free. <a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc/statuses/2440687525">in reply to Kroc</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2440752131">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc">Kroc</a> It&#39;s irrelevant for those who don&#39;t care about video. For real videographers is relevant cause they don&#39;t want to see footage suck. <a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc/statuses/2440675441">in reply to Kroc</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2440730740">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc">Kroc</a> h.264 _is_ better than Theora. I tried last night the much-hyped &quot;optimized&quot; version of Theora, it&#39;s still way worse than h.264. <a href="http://twitter.com/Kroc/statuses/2435532873">in reply to Kroc</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2440630125">#</a></li>
<li>So, this is going to be my entry for the #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23Ubuntu">Ubuntu</a> video competition: <a href="http://vimeo.com/5420428" rel="nofollow">http://vimeo.com/5420428</a> Now, I have to figure out Ogg Theora @<a href="http://twitter.com/jonobacon">jonobacon</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2434067794">#</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/03/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-07-03/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daily Twitter Update for 2009-07-02</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/02/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-07-02/</link>
		<comments>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/02/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-07-02/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eugenia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/02/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-07-02/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Fucking hell, Vegas Pro 9 is so buggy that I will have to continue using v8. Latest #cineform and plugins just don&#39;t work properly! #
I found lots of bugs on Vegas Pro 9. I really hate using buggy software. #
Editing the video I will submit to Ubuntu&#39;s competition. I have a few ideas to use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="aktt_tweet_digest">
<li>Fucking hell, Vegas Pro 9 is so buggy that I will have to continue using v8. Latest #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23cineform">cineform</a> and plugins just don&#39;t work properly! <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2433549189">#</a></li>
<li>I found lots of bugs on Vegas Pro 9. I really hate using buggy software. <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2433355389">#</a></li>
<li>Editing the video I will submit to Ubuntu&#39;s competition. I have a few ideas to use some unused footage I had around. <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2432631097">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/indiequick">indiequick</a> Does this count? <a href="http://twitter.com/slfisher/statuses/2430420582" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/slfisher/statuses/2430420582</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/indiequick/statuses/2430430267">in reply to indiequick</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2430453984">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/jbqueru">jbqueru</a> I love you too my little baby komodo slash meerkat. <a href="http://twitter.com/jbqueru/statuses/2430059310">in reply to jbqueru</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2430205674">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/jbqueru">jbqueru</a> Your only obligation is to buy me sushi. Everything else is towards that end. <a href="http://twitter.com/jbqueru/statuses/2429971384">in reply to jbqueru</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2430000464">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/jbqueru">jbqueru</a> You just need to work in another aspect of the job. Stay away from that specific task. <a href="http://twitter.com/jbqueru/statuses/2429595300">in reply to jbqueru</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2429780105">#</a></li>
<li>Google banned my IP for searching and looking at some Madonna pictures in their &quot;Life magazine&quot; picture source. They think I am a bot. <img src='http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2428180888">#</a></li>
<li>Since I upgraded our Vista64 machine to SP2, USB devices take forever to wake up. Any clues? <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2427842593">#</a></li>
<li>Child of modern society: hormones, drugs, pills and what not, then flushing it down the toilet: <a href="http://bit.ly/pg7Mn" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/pg7Mn</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2426449862">#</a></li>
<li>I want to go home to my mountain village. Kiss hens on the back of their heads, listen to the Aherontas river, watch the sheep go by *sniff* <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2425759546">#</a></li>
<li>I just noticed that if @<a href="http://twitter.com/jbqueru">jbqueru</a> is not on IM I don&#39;t load up IM at all. This is why I wasn&#39;t on IM almost at all this past month. <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2425650514">#</a></li>
<li>I don&#39;t know if it&#39;s Firefox 3.5&#39;s fault or my connection&#39;s, but since I upgraded many pages don&#39;t load, randomly. I need to keep reloading. <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2425296584">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/slewis">slewis</a> A signature forgerying is way easier than correctly photoshoping two pictures, one of which must not be on google-images. <a href="http://twitter.com/slewis/statuses/2424549565">in reply to slewis</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2424677608">#</a></li>
<li>I don&#39;t understand why people are asking celebrities for autographs. I would just ask for a pic. Isn&#39;t this a better way to prove the meet? <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2424223646">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/TheRealPoin">TheRealPoin</a> No, it&#39;s not better. Each newer model is a bit better than the older one. <a href="http://twitter.com/TheRealPoin/statuses/2367399538">in reply to TheRealPoin</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2417681201">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/derbykid">derbykid</a> Email me if you need help with that. I can help out with the dilemma. <a href="http://twitter.com/derbykid/statuses/2397953820">in reply to derbykid</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2417673387">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/ripicard">ripicard</a> Email me if you need help with the HV20. <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2417670210">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/kipb">kipb</a> A camcorder is made for video, a DSLR is not. It&#39;s a bit of a hack. <a href="http://twitter.com/kipb/statuses/2408889593">in reply to kipb</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2417663530">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/jashanmakan">jashanmakan</a> Which one was your entry for the HV20 competition? <a href="http://twitter.com/jashanmakan/statuses/2413643803">in reply to jashanmakan</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2417638901">#</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/02/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-07-02/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Water &amp; Wind</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/02/water-wind/</link>
		<comments>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/02/water-wind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eugenia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filmmaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/?p=3914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the sea life spends the day like any other day, by drifting in the oceans, the humans share the fun in their own way. The video tries to convey the message that we should share the space with other species without getting in their way.
This is going to be my entry to the Ubuntu [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the sea life spends the day like any other day, by drifting in the oceans, the humans share the fun in their own way. The video tries to convey the message that we should share the space with other species without getting in their way.</p>
<p>This is going to be my entry to the Ubuntu <a href="http://www.jonobacon.org/2009/06/13/the-ubuntu-free-culture-showcase-kicks-off/">video competition</a>. It&#8217;s comprised from previously unused footage I had lying around. Now I need to figure out how to fit this 00:57 seconds of video in just 2.5 MBs of filesize, in an unoptimized Ogg Theora version no less, and it has to be fully tagged! I foresee some sleepless nights trying to fit it.</p>
<p><center><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="512" height="288" data="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5420428&amp;server=www.vimeo.com&amp;fullscreen=1&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=ff9933"><param name="quality" value="best" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="scale" value="showAll" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5420428&amp;server=www.vimeo.com&amp;fullscreen=1&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=ff9933" /></object></center></p>
<p>Fish footage was shot with the Canon SX200 IS digicam at the Monterrey Bay Aquarium, and the kite surfing scenes were shot with my Canon HV20 close to the San Mateo bridge. HD version and .mp4 HD download <a href="http://vimeo.com/5420428">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/02/water-wind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daily Twitter Update for 2009-07-01</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/01/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-07-01/</link>
		<comments>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/01/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-07-01/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eugenia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/01/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-07-01/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Shot with the RED One camera: http://apple.com/trailers/wb/theinformant/ Does it look like video? #
Upgraded to Firefox 3.5. Looks the same as before. #
And so The Pirate Bay is selling out so they can pay up. This is such a big RIAA win! I said it before: Creative Commons is the only way. #
HV20/30/40 users: go here [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="aktt_tweet_digest">
<li>Shot with the RED One camera: <a href="http://apple.com/trailers/wb/theinformant/" rel="nofollow">http://apple.com/trailers/wb/theinformant/</a> Does it look like video? <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2416858955">#</a></li>
<li>Upgraded to Firefox 3.5. Looks the same as before. <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2416807427">#</a></li>
<li>And so The Pirate Bay is selling out so they can pay up. This is such a big RIAA win! I said it before: Creative Commons is the only way. <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2415837581">#</a></li>
<li>HV20/30/40 users: go here <a href="http://bit.ly/7xiQa" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7xiQa</a><br />
 watch the films, and vote for your favorite film! <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2415678469">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/jbqueru">jbqueru</a> I would still love you though&#8230; <img src='http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' />  <a href="http://twitter.com/jbqueru/statuses/2414227022">in reply to jbqueru</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2414330808">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/sethadam1">sethadam1</a> A new day, a new STD for Mayer&#8230; <a href="http://twitter.com/sethadam1/statuses/2413752686">in reply to sethadam1</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2413810852">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/slewis">slewis</a>  But other aspects are not comparable, the camcorder will always win because it was designed to do video. <a href="http://twitter.com/slewis/statuses/2413234785">in reply to slewis</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2413364552">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/slewis">slewis</a> But overall, it has a very good quality at 24 mbps at 720p res. Obviously, the bitrate is higher than AVCHD 1080p at 24 mbps. <a href="http://twitter.com/slewis/statuses/2413234785">in reply to slewis</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2413363533">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/slewis">slewis</a> What you can compare, is the SX200 IS to other cheap HD digicams. And when the light is good, it kicks everyone else&#39;s ass. <a href="http://twitter.com/slewis/statuses/2413234785">in reply to slewis</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2413346847">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/slewis">slewis</a> Not comparable. If you want a camcorder, you buy a camcorder. An HD digicam is only for the times that you want to go small &amp; mobile <a href="http://twitter.com/slewis/statuses/2413234785">in reply to slewis</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2413335636">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/slewis">slewis</a> A Canon SX200 IS. It costs $330 at Costco, cheaper than anyone else, even Amazon. <a href="http://twitter.com/slewis/statuses/2412953052">in reply to slewis</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2413086804">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/slewis">slewis</a> Look at my latest video on Vimeo. It was shot with the SX200 IS. It came out pretty good. <a href="http://twitter.com/slewis/statuses/2412986484">in reply to slewis</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2413067176">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/slewis">slewis</a> The SX200 IS has manual focus. It just doesn&#39;t do 24p. <a href="http://twitter.com/slewis/statuses/2412986484">in reply to slewis</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2413046531">#</a></li>
<li>The people who disagree with Gaga=Next-Madonna, are simply too young to have experienced the Like a Virgin era. I was there. I am old. <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2412913522">#</a></li>
<li>Lady Gaga *is* the next Madonna: <a href="http://is.gd/1jyCZ" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/1jyCZ</a> Her career curve and the visual stimulation she creates matches the Madonna of 1985. <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2412897805">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/slewis">slewis</a> Man, you should read my blog: <a href="http://bit.ly/Vm7ZO" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/Vm7ZO</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/slewis/statuses/2412523102">in reply to slewis</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2412855672">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/guyma">guyma</a> Maybe&#8230; if you are a good boy&#8230; <a href="http://twitter.com/guyma/statuses/2412777038">in reply to guyma</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2412849977">#</a></li>
<li>Just finished my TV interview for MYX: <a href="http://myx.tv" rel="nofollow">http://myx.tv</a> I think it went pretty good, we will see in a few months when it airs. <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2412327474">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/David_Newman">David_Newman</a> The state of current video editors compared to the 3D boom, and how well prepared they are? <a href="http://twitter.com/David_Newman/statuses/2410355853">in reply to David_Newman</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2410438795">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/vqueru">vqueru</a> Now complete your profile, and add a picture! <img src='http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  <a href="http://twitter.com/vqueru/statuses/2408630948">in reply to vqueru</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2409339721">#</a></li>
<li>A new way to remove PF24 pulldown with Sony Vegas. The method works well, but it has limitations. Read here: <a href="http://is.gd/1joIW" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/1joIW</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2408586032">#</a></li>
<li>Ate some donuts. Will prepare some grilled tuna today for lunch. Then, the TV interview. My knees are shaking. <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2406847334">#</a></li>
<li>@<a href="http://twitter.com/paloaltorealtor">paloaltorealtor</a> Yesterday, we were at Hotaru. They have some of the best priced and good quality sushi in the Bay Area. It&#39;s always full. <a href="http://twitter.com/paloaltorealtor/statuses/2400263838">in reply to paloaltorealtor</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2406002758">#</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/01/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-07-01/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faking PF24 Pulldown Removal with Vegas</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/06/30/faking-pf24-pulldown-removal-with-vegas/</link>
		<comments>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/06/30/faking-pf24-pulldown-removal-with-vegas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eugenia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filmmaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/?p=3886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sony Vegas does not have a proper way of removing pulldown removal on PF24 streams, but there is a hack/workaround that can work just fine for some users. There are limitations to this &#8220;fake&#8221; PF24 pulldown removal, but if someone is willing to live with these limitations, the result is acceptable.
So, basically, by telling Vegas [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony Vegas does not have a proper way of removing pulldown removal on PF24 streams, but there is a hack/workaround that can work just fine for some users. There are limitations to this &#8220;fake&#8221; PF24 pulldown removal, but if someone is willing to live with these limitations, the result is acceptable.</p>
<p>So, basically, by telling Vegas that this is HDV-24p footage (and if you run the Pro version, by creating an HDV-24p SMPTE timeline), it attempts pulldown removal. Because Vegas only supports pulldown removal from streams that have attributes (e.g. from Sony&#8217;s cameras rather than the consumer Canons), the removal fails.</p>
<p>However, if you drop the project properties *and* exporting quality to &#8220;preview&#8221; quality, Vegas drops a field and the pulldown removal is successful. Not only there are no duplicate frames used, but you get a clean output (no ghosting). In fact, the pulldown removal is frame-by-frame sync&#8217;ed to a Cineform&#8217;s pulldown removed version of the clip &#8212; which tells me that the timestamp output is correct. Not only that, but Vegas does pulldown removal even more correctly than Cineform (my Cineform NeoHD seemed to completely ignore and crop-out the last 4-5 frames out of a 14 sec PF24 clip, while Vegas didn&#8217;t).</p>
<p>Here are the advantages:<br />
1. No need to transcode to any other format. You edit as you normally would, directly.<br />
2. It&#8217;s the easiest method to deal with PF24&#8217;s ghosting.<br />
3. Works with both PF24 from HDV and AVCHD Canon cameras (possibly the consumer Panasonics too).<br />
4. Works with both Vegas Pro and Platinum (although the Pro has the additional ability to set an SMPTE 24p-HDV timeline).<br />
5. Faster exporting at the end, at &#8220;preview&#8221; quality 720p. Will look just fine on Youtube/Vimeo HD or on PS3/XBoX360/AppleTV.</p>
<p>And, here are the limitations:<br />
1. You can only edit/export in &#8220;preview&#8221; quality. This means that color grading, effects, and added text <i>will NOT</i> look as good as if you had used &#8220;best&#8221; quality to edit/export.<br />
2. You can&#8217;t export above 720p. In fact, because the &#8220;preview&#8221; quality drops one field, the real resolution you get out of this trick is 540p. But upresizing to 720p from 540p, is not a big deal. However, you can NOT export in 1440&#215;1080 or 1920&#215;1080, or the interlacing will kick in, as shown in the images below.</p>
<p><center><a href="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/images/best720.jpg"><img src="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/images/best720s.jpg" border="1"></a><br />
<small><i>Exporting in &#8220;best&#8221; quality will result in the default PF24 look when pulldown is not removed: ghosting whenever there&#8217;s movement in the scene.</i></small></p>
<p><a href="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/images/preview1920.jpg"><img src="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/images/preview1920s.jpg" border="1"></a><br />
<small><i>Exporting in &#8220;preview&#8221; quality at full 1080p, interlacing kicks in, since the &#8220;preview&#8221; setting doesn&#8217;t take deinterlacing into account.</i></small></p>
<p><a href="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/images/preview720.jpg"><img src="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/images/preview720s.jpg" border="1"></a><br />
<small><i>Exporting in &#8220;preview&#8221; quality at 720p (or 540p) does the right thing: no ghosting, no interlacing, and no duplicated frames. Pulldown is removed.</i></small></center></p>
<p>If you are good with these limitations (quality/resolution), here&#8217;s how to go about it:<br />
<span id="more-3886"></span></p>
<p>First, make sure your footage was shot in PF24 mode. Then, set up project properties exactly like the following image (use 1920&#215;1080/1.0000 if you are using AVCHD sources). Vegas Platinum users, ignore any fields that don&#8217;t show up in your version.<br />
<center><img src="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/images/sonyavc-1.png" border="1"></center></p>
<p>This step is for Vegas Pro users only:<br />
<center><img src="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/images/sonyavc-2.png" border="1"></center></p>
<p>Then, edit. After you are done editing, export using the SonyAVC filetype. I simply modified an existing template below, some of these form fields are editable:<br />
<center><img src="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/images/sonyavc-3.png" border="1"><br />
<img src="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/images/sonyavc-4.png" border="1"><br />
<img src="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/images/sonyavc-5.png" border="1"><br />
<img src="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/images/sonyavc-6.png" border="1"></center></p>
<p>If you decide to export using the MainConcept h.264 encoder instead of SonyAVC&#8217;s (available for customization only in Vegas Pro), then you can use VBR bitrate to achieve better quality (e.g. 5 mbps average, 9 mbps max).</p>
<p>So, test it, and see if you are happy with what you get. In most cases, it should look fine enough. Otherwise, buy <a href="http://www.cineform.com/neoscene/">Cineform NeoSCENE</a> ($129), or use the freeware method tutorials (<a href="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/07/13/canon-hv20-24p-pulldown/">HDV</a>, <a href="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/01/04/canon-avchd-24p-pulldown-removal/">AVCHD</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/06/30/faking-pf24-pulldown-removal-with-vegas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daily Twitter Update for 2009-06-30</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/06/30/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-06-30/</link>
		<comments>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/06/30/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-06-30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eugenia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/06/30/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-06-30/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Sushi was great: tuna, salmon, halibut, eel, shrimp, mackerel, rolls. I would have liked more mackerel I think, or some red snapper. #
I was always good at climbing trees, but particularly bad at getting down! Fear of heights made me ask for a ladder a couple of times&#8230; #
Tomorrow I am shooting the TV interview. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="aktt_tweet_digest">
<li>Sushi was great: tuna, salmon, halibut, eel, shrimp, mackerel, rolls. I would have liked more mackerel I think, or some red snapper. <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2397753832">#</a></li>
<li>I was always good at climbing trees, but particularly bad at getting down! Fear of heights made me ask for a ladder a couple of times&#8230; <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2396499049">#</a></li>
<li>Tomorrow I am shooting the TV interview. Hopefully I won&#39;t forget words when I speak, as it usually happens (in both english and greek)&#8230; <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2395069827">#</a></li>
<li>Listening to &quot;5th Avenue&quot; by Dustin Shey. Nice atmosphere in the song. <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2394960278">#</a></li>
<li>Reused my old iPod Mini as my indie mp3 player, and I use Songbird to sync these files rather than iTunes (I&#39;d need more than 1 libraries). <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2394537266">#</a></li>
<li>Cooked some carbonara today. We might have sushi tonight though&#8230; <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2394515932">#</a></li>
<li>And apparently, I have some type-2 diabetes too &#8212; in addition to all my other health problems. <a href="http://twitter.com/EugeniaLoli/statuses/2393554964">#</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/06/30/daily-twitter-update-for-2009-06-30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Top-10 MUST FIX features for Vegas</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/06/29/the-top-10-must-fix-features-for-vegas/</link>
		<comments>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/06/29/the-top-10-must-fix-features-for-vegas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eugenia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filmmaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/?p=3878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sony Vegas is the editor of my choice, but it&#8217;s far from perfect. In fact, depending on what kind of footage you are throwing at it, it might even be the worst tool for the job. This is my top-10 must-fix feature requests that I would like Sony to take care of. While this is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony Vegas is the editor of my choice, but it&#8217;s far from perfect. In fact, depending on what kind of footage you are throwing at it, it might even be the worst tool for the job. This is my top-10 must-fix feature requests that I would like Sony to take care of. While this is &#8220;my&#8221; list, it is very much influenced by questions and bug reports users online are over-flowing Vegas forums with. In order:</p>
<p><em>1. MP4/MOV support</em><br />
MPEG4 footage from digicams and digirecorders (MPEG4-SP and MPEG4-AVC) is a no-go with Vegas. We are talking about super-slow previewing, and crashes right from the minute you populate the project media, or randomly later when you edit. Especially when using KODAK mpeg4-SP footage from their digicams, and you change the window focus away from Vegas, the media are &#8220;going offline&#8221;, and they don&#8217;t ever come back to life (or it takes some ridiculously long time to do). Curiously, AVCHD support is not bad at all on Vegas, but that&#8217;s because it&#8217;s using internally an optimized decoder for it, while for MP4/MOV it&#8217;s using the stock Quicktime or MainConcept decoders that Vegas doesn&#8217;t like working with very much. Given that even cheap digicams now do HD (and with <a href="http://vimeo.com/5358244">good quality</A> too), more and more users are throwing away their home camcorders and go digicam-only. It affects more users than Sony would be comfortable to admit (and don&#8217;t let me start in the whole Canon 5D video subculture that&#8217;s now very strong). It&#8217;s their loss, since these users will have to eventually shop for another editor that handles these formats better.</p>
<p><em>2. SonyAVC encoder crashes</em><br />
This is a much reported issue: the SonyAVC encoder crashing reproducibly when exporting in higher 1080i/1080p resolutions. Unfortunately, no fix has been released for it, over a year after it was first reported repeatedly. This is poor support, right there. I stumble on it so often on my own installation and on online forums that I can&#8217;t hold back my anger any longer for this bug not getting fixed.</p>
<p><em>3. No intermediate codec</em><br />
Vegas ships right now with <a href="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/09/10/no-intermediate-codec-no-sex-for-you/">no serious intermediate codec</a> in its ranks. One has to realistically pony up $500 to buy Cineform NeoHD to be able to export to that codec via Vegas. Unfortunately, using free intermediate codecs, like Huffyuv and Lagarith, they suck compared to Cineform; while Vegas is simply not optimized for the Avid&#8217;s freeware DNxHD codec. All these free codecs playback at 5-7 fps, while Cineform is real time. Obviously, this is a case where Sony should pay up for a new engineer to come and optimize DNxHD (and maybe do a deal with AVID too). I don&#8217;t hold my breath though.</p>
<p><em>4. Defaults: Disable Resampling and Interpolation deinterlacing</em><br />
Defaults matter. This is true for any piece of software. 99% of Vegas&#8217; users&#8217; footage sucks quality-wise because they use the defaults: resampling and blend fields. Both these options create such big amount of ghosting, that it&#8217;s not even funny. Blend fields creates ghosting every time there&#8217;s movement in the frame (which is all the time for normal users who usually are handheld), and resampling kicks in every time a user slow-motion&#8217;s his footage, or he drops his 30p digicam footage on an NTSC timeline. Sony must change these defaults to catter for these users, and let the professionals (who are fewer in number) change these if they have to. At least the pros would supposedly know what to do.</p>
<p><em>5. Project Properties Wizard</em><br />
When you start a new project on Platinum, you get this retarted dialog of &#8220;how you would like to export&#8221;, and then it configures your project properties according to your exporting needs rather than the source footage&#8217;s properties. I have extensively explained <a href="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/08/28/sony-vegas-platinum-9/">here</a> why this is the worst idea EVER.</p>
<p><em>6. Proxy editing</em><br />
With support for RED&#8217;s footage, and even the very demanding Canon 5D format, Sony might need to work in implementing proxy editing. Right now there is a proxy <a href="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/04/13/proxy-editing-with-sony-vegas-part-ii/">script</a>, but it only works in the PRO version of Vegas, while <a href="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/12/12/proxy-editing-with-sony-vegas/">my own method</a> that works with both Vegas versions, is a bit too complex for most people to put it around their heads.</p>
<p><em>7. Stabilization plugin</em><br />
Come on now. Even iMovie got one of these! People just shoot handheld crap all the time. This is a must-have. Buying the third party Boris-FX stabilization plugin for $200 is something a family man (who is the person most in need for it) would never do. This must be part of the default Vegas package.</p>
<p><em>8. Up to 16x speed, and speed control</em><br />
Currently, you can only slow-mo or speed up your footage up to 4x. That&#8217;s just not enough for me in many cases. In the Pro version there are Velocity Envelopes that allow you to go faster/slower than 4x, but that&#8217;s just not precise handling. Then, there&#8217;s the whole controling of the speed issue: it doesn&#8217;t interpolate interlaced footage like After Effects does to make 60p out of 60i and create smoother slow-mo. Neither it let&#8217;s you specify speed rate in percentages (so you can&#8217;t shoot a sped-up music video in 30p NTSC and slow-it down at 25p PAL &#8212; right now, you have to shoot 30p, slow it down to 24p, and then use a convoluted <a href="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/09/23/vegas-tip-re-timing-your-video/">tutorial</a> to re-time it to 25p, a hot mess).</p>
<p><em>9. Support for Adobe Bridge</em><br />
The truth is, Vegas is an editing app, not an effects one. A common problem professionals have is to which format to export from Vegas to After Effects. It would be easier if Vegas was to somehow support Adobe Bridge, so sending and receiving footage from AE is easier. I personally have AE installed, and I can&#8217;t get bothered with it just because integration between the two apps is not good. Too much of a pain. And for those who want to get bothered, they might even leave Vegas for Premiere. There&#8217;s money in this feature: by keeping your existing pros on your side.</p>
<p><em>10. Per-color plugin</em><br />
We need a powerful color grading plugin that let&#8217;s you do everything <a href="http://www.moosehill.se/index.php?page=vegas/6cc.php">this plugin</a> does. Unfortunately, while this plugin almost does a lot of what&#8217;s needed for serious color grading (full control over the rainbow colors), it&#8217;s unstable as hell. Even the new version of that plugin, from the same developer, is even more unstable. We need something like it, officially. Especially since Red Giant Software doesn&#8217;t care porting their Colorista app on Vegas, this is one more reason to put an engineer working on that. Magic Bullet doesn&#8217;t give you control on what I am describing btw.</p>
<p>In conclusion, there&#8217;s all the clean up that needs to be done, e.g. fix DVD-import A/V sync issues, DivX/XViD bug fixes with the XViD decoder, more options on the media manager (e.g. visual cues if a clip is already used in the timeline or not), DVDs templates now exporting in lower field only, streaming support in AVC/MainConcept h.264 encoders, VBR encoding in SonyAVC, AVCHD progressive/24p/bitrate editable exporting options, easier re-timing of footage, importing AVCHD elementary streams, more pulldown removal/addition support (e.g. PF24), optimized WMV editing, etc etc. But the above 10 are the most important ones, and the top-5 are what most users would hit before you can even say &#8220;huh?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/06/29/the-top-10-must-fix-features-for-vegas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Jackson: Debt is his real legacy</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/06/28/michael-jackson-debt-is-his-real-legacy/</link>
		<comments>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/06/28/michael-jackson-debt-is-his-real-legacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eugenia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/?p=3868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone is busy with eulogies these days about this guy. What a true artist he was, how popular, what a glorious career, what an icon.
My ass.
I don&#8217;t give a monkey if this guy released Thriller, or popularized the moonwalk. And yes, I am super-familiar with his career, since I was a huge fan of his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is busy with eulogies these days about this guy. What a true artist he was, how popular, what a glorious career, what an icon.</p>
<p>My ass.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t give a monkey if this guy released Thriller, or popularized the moonwalk. And yes, I am super-familiar with his career, since I was a huge fan of his in the &#8217;80s and early &#8217;90s. Everyone who knew me during high school can attest to that. Even saw him live once, at a concert in Germany (and made a big fuss about it to my then-fiance to go see MJ live). Many times I had fought with my father for the TV&#8217;s remote control for me wanting to watch.</p>
<p>What concerns me instead is his reported $200-$400 million debt he leaves behind. That&#8217;s what&#8217;s bugging me. His current estate and future sales will pay for part of this debt, but it won&#8217;t be enough to pay it all back. Naturally, his children &#8212; and their children &#8212; will have to work all their life to payback their father&#8217;s careless overspending. Unless MJ&#8217;s girlfriend, Tinkerbell, allows for a miracle to happen, these children will never be free. <b>Update:</b> <i>Reader Steve says in the comments that in the US the kids won&#8217;t be held responsible paying off that debt. Let&#8217;s hope that&#8217;s how it&#8217;s going to play out.</i></p>
<p>Some will say &#8220;separate the man from his art&#8221;, but in this case, the man has more impact to me than his art. I am sorry to say, but this debt is the only &#8220;legacy&#8221; I see Jackson leaving behind. Its effects on his children are so powerful in my mind, that <em>overshadows everything else he accomplished in his life and career</em>. I can&#8217;t stand listening to his music anymore because of the person he became (and no, I don&#8217;t even count the pederasty allegations). He let himself to get hooked on drugs, became careless about his spending, and on top of all that, he wanted children! What for? As new puppies?</p>
<p>The usual argument against all this is &#8220;but he had a hard star-child life&#8221;. Well, that&#8217;s all bullshit. He had TWENTY+ years to SORT OUT his psychological problems. Thank God, during the &#8217;80s he had enough money to employ top-shrinks to help him out. So putting that &#8220;child star&#8221; argument over and over, is weak after a few years. He has absolutely no excuse. Neither he, or his close family for not reporting his addiction/psycho problems to the police to not allow him to take custody of his children (that&#8217;s what responsible people should do, even if they end up alienating themselves). Then again, after <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgli9UYUT8M">watching this</a>, I don&#8217;t believe that anyone in his &#8220;family&#8221; ever gave a shit about MJ.</p>
<p>So let him rot in hell. Spare me the eulogies that the internet and TV is full of (I can&#8217;t even escape iTunes/Amazon&#8217;s top-10 lists). My only hope is for a way out, for his children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/06/28/michael-jackson-debt-is-his-real-legacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
