Comments on: Birds at the San Gregorio beach http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/10/11/birds-at-the-san-gregorio-beach/ Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:20:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Eugenia http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/10/11/birds-at-the-san-gregorio-beach/#comment-8407 Eugenia Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:20:07 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/?p=4588#comment-8407 It doesn't say CC-BT, it says CC-BY. It's Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. It doesn’t say CC-BT, it says CC-BY. It’s Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

]]> By: Rameish http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/10/11/birds-at-the-san-gregorio-beach/#comment-8406 Rameish Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:16:12 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/?p=4588#comment-8406 Eugenia, What's CC-BT 3.0? Eugenia,

What’s CC-BT 3.0?

]]> By: William Eggington http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/10/11/birds-at-the-san-gregorio-beach/#comment-8404 William Eggington Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:41:27 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/?p=4588#comment-8404 Do they make a camera that can give you more information than just color? Like. . . depth? Shape recognition etc? Do they make a camera that can give you more information than just color? Like. . . depth? Shape recognition etc?

]]> By: Eugenia http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/10/11/birds-at-the-san-gregorio-beach/#comment-8395 Eugenia Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:25:05 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/?p=4588#comment-8395 There was a slight adjustment of saturation, not any heavy processing. There was a slight adjustment of saturation, not any heavy processing.

]]> By: tOnGAs http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/10/11/birds-at-the-san-gregorio-beach/#comment-8393 tOnGAs Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:48:23 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/?p=4588#comment-8393 I like the 5th. Although the bird on the right is a bit "eaten" by the right border, imho. I wonder, did you apply a bit of post-processing ? Or are these shots "direct from camera" (in that case I really should take a close look to this model) ? I like the 5th. Although the bird on the right is a bit “eaten” by the right border, imho.
I wonder, did you apply a bit of post-processing ? Or are these shots “direct from camera” (in that case I really should take a close look to this model) ?

]]> By: Eugenia http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/10/11/birds-at-the-san-gregorio-beach/#comment-8392 Eugenia Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:17:11 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/?p=4588#comment-8392 The 6th is my favorite, it has 3 layers of birds, in layers of wood. It requires a bit of careful look to realize it though. Not bad for a 5 minute handheld shooting with a digicam. The 6th is my favorite, it has 3 layers of birds, in layers of wood. It requires a bit of careful look to realize it though. Not bad for a 5 minute handheld shooting with a digicam.

]]> By: William Eggington http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/10/11/birds-at-the-san-gregorio-beach/#comment-8391 William Eggington Mon, 12 Oct 2009 03:15:51 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/?p=4588#comment-8391 I think I like that very first one the best. All this nifty detail but then heaps of "space" created by the depth of field. Nice job. I think I like that very first one the best. All this nifty detail but then heaps of “space” created by the depth of field. Nice job.

]]>