<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Regarding the Google Chrome OS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/08/regarding-the-google-chrome-os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/08/regarding-the-google-chrome-os/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:56:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: adam hartung</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/08/regarding-the-google-chrome-os/#comment-7692</link>
		<dc:creator>adam hartung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/?p=3961#comment-7692</guid>
		<description>That Google would go after this new business surprises only those that don&#039;t understand Google.  Industrial-era thinkers believe you should &quot;stick to your focus&quot;.  Like GM.  But Google knows that in an information economy if you don&#039;t keep moving into new markets with new technologies looking for more revenues you won&#039;t survive.  Read more at http://www.ThePhoenixPrinciple.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Google would go after this new business surprises only those that don&#8217;t understand Google.  Industrial-era thinkers believe you should &#8220;stick to your focus&#8221;.  Like GM.  But Google knows that in an information economy if you don&#8217;t keep moving into new markets with new technologies looking for more revenues you won&#8217;t survive.  Read more at <a href="http://www.ThePhoenixPrinciple.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ThePhoenixPrinciple.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stormrider</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/08/regarding-the-google-chrome-os/#comment-7689</link>
		<dc:creator>stormrider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/?p=3961#comment-7689</guid>
		<description>Web OSes are the future, and I am surprised Google is the only one making serious steps towards that direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web OSes are the future, and I am surprised Google is the only one making serious steps towards that direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kragil</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/08/regarding-the-google-chrome-os/#comment-7688</link>
		<dc:creator>Kragil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/?p=3961#comment-7688</guid>
		<description>I think with Google Native Client support the browser can run every app you fancy.(in the long run)

Not sure if you want to .. but if you aren&#039;t a hardcore free software guy it shouldn&#039;t be a problem if done right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think with Google Native Client support the browser can run every app you fancy.(in the long run)</p>
<p>Not sure if you want to .. but if you aren&#8217;t a hardcore free software guy it shouldn&#8217;t be a problem if done right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Eggington</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/08/regarding-the-google-chrome-os/#comment-7687</link>
		<dc:creator>William Eggington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/?p=3961#comment-7687</guid>
		<description>himanshu:  I don&#039;t think anyone has ever done it very well.  All the linux distributions I have ever tried are packed FULL of things I will never ever use and when I try and do a minimal install. . . you end up in dependency hell just to install the basics.  So then you have to hunt around for a minimal but functional distro that gets close.  For me its Linux Mint but. . . even with that I spent ages removing things I&#039;d never use.


I&#039;m kind of excited by this.

Eugenia: I don&#039;t really see there being any problem with video editing.  I doubt you will have to upload all your un-compressed videos to the internet before you could edit.  They&#039;d just sit on your Raid plugged into that computer.  So the app would be in the &quot;cloud&quot; but it would have to use your local CPU and GPU for the edit itself.

For 3D apps. . . this has a LOT of potential.  Especially for hard core artists that use procedural textures and Sub-D geometry.  Very tiny on the file sizes.  Perfect for the &quot;Cloud Computing&quot; world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>himanshu:  I don&#8217;t think anyone has ever done it very well.  All the linux distributions I have ever tried are packed FULL of things I will never ever use and when I try and do a minimal install. . . you end up in dependency hell just to install the basics.  So then you have to hunt around for a minimal but functional distro that gets close.  For me its Linux Mint but. . . even with that I spent ages removing things I&#8217;d never use.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m kind of excited by this.</p>
<p>Eugenia: I don&#8217;t really see there being any problem with video editing.  I doubt you will have to upload all your un-compressed videos to the internet before you could edit.  They&#8217;d just sit on your Raid plugged into that computer.  So the app would be in the &#8220;cloud&#8221; but it would have to use your local CPU and GPU for the edit itself.</p>
<p>For 3D apps. . . this has a LOT of potential.  Especially for hard core artists that use procedural textures and Sub-D geometry.  Very tiny on the file sizes.  Perfect for the &#8220;Cloud Computing&#8221; world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: himanshu</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2009/07/08/regarding-the-google-chrome-os/#comment-7686</link>
		<dc:creator>himanshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/?p=3961#comment-7686</guid>
		<description>Stick &quot;Google&quot; label on any crap, and people consider it a work of art :)

its just a barebone os to run a browser. What&#039;s so special about about it ? It&#039;s been done a thousand times by noname programmers... :)

and they are prob dropping x window system in favor of custom windowing library... let&#039;s see how people react to this webos...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stick &#8220;Google&#8221; label on any crap, and people consider it a work of art <img src='http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>its just a barebone os to run a browser. What&#8217;s so special about about it ? It&#8217;s been done a thousand times by noname programmers&#8230; <img src='http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>and they are prob dropping x window system in favor of custom windowing library&#8230; let&#8217;s see how people react to this webos&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
