<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stanford University Campus revisited</title>
	<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/17/stanford-university-campus-revisited/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Eugenia</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/17/stanford-university-campus-revisited/#comment-6471</link>
		<author>Eugenia</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/17/stanford-university-campus-revisited/#comment-6471</guid>
		<description>Nope, didn't have the WA lens back then yet. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, didn&#8217;t have the WA lens back then yet. <img src='http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/17/stanford-university-campus-revisited/#comment-6468</link>
		<author>Jorge</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/17/stanford-university-campus-revisited/#comment-6468</guid>
		<description>I also liked the "frame within frame" shot (the one your husband appears) and the end wow...nice shallow DOF. I guess you obviously had to be somewhat zoomed-in to get this shallow DoF...was the WA apater on when you took this particular shot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also liked the &#8220;frame within frame&#8221; shot (the one your husband appears) and the end wow&#8230;nice shallow DOF. I guess you obviously had to be somewhat zoomed-in to get this shallow DoF&#8230;was the WA apater on when you took this particular shot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/17/stanford-university-campus-revisited/#comment-6467</link>
		<author>Jorge</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/17/stanford-university-campus-revisited/#comment-6467</guid>
		<description>I was watching this again now calmly...I liked the position for the initial text overlay and LOVED how you colored it (to match the flowers below)...sweet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was watching this again now calmly&#8230;I liked the position for the initial text overlay and LOVED how you colored it (to match the flowers below)&#8230;sweet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/17/stanford-university-campus-revisited/#comment-6394</link>
		<author>Michael</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/17/stanford-university-campus-revisited/#comment-6394</guid>
		<description>"Additionally, Vimeo removed the ability to get high quality re-encoding out of 480p video" -- this sucks, because as it turned out it is possible to get quite nice web video out of regular widescreen DV footage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Additionally, Vimeo removed the ability to get high quality re-encoding out of 480p video&#8221; &#8212; this sucks, because as it turned out it is possible to get quite nice web video out of regular widescreen DV footage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugenia</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/17/stanford-university-campus-revisited/#comment-6385</link>
		<author>Eugenia</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/17/stanford-university-campus-revisited/#comment-6385</guid>
		<description>I reproduced it a number of times but it doesn't happen all the time. Yeah, XP has lower bitrate than vimeo, but they are working on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reproduced it a number of times but it doesn&#8217;t happen all the time. Yeah, XP has lower bitrate than vimeo, but they are working on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l3v1</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/17/stanford-university-campus-revisited/#comment-6384</link>
		<author>l3v1</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/17/stanford-university-campus-revisited/#comment-6384</guid>
		<description>"1. When I pressed âstopâ on a video, the video stopped, but the audio continued to playback."

I couldn't reproduce that. But, I also think some videos are too low bitrate. I found a video which always stopped at a few seconds of play. But I kinda like it overall, will check back on it later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;1. When I pressed âstopâ on a video, the video stopped, but the audio continued to playback.&#8221;</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t reproduce that. But, I also think some videos are too low bitrate. I found a video which always stopped at a few seconds of play. But I kinda like it overall, will check back on it later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugenia</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/17/stanford-university-campus-revisited/#comment-6382</link>
		<author>Eugenia</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 07:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/17/stanford-university-campus-revisited/#comment-6382</guid>
		<description>I checked out this web site, and I find the 720p resolution of the videos embarrassingly pixelated, sorry. The overall design is not bad, but the re-encoded HD videos are too low on bitrate, the 720p versions stall too easily (it seems that you don't use servers with fast pipes), I don't see an ability to download the original video (I am using Vimeo as a vessel for people to download my CC-BY videos to re-use them as stock footage you see), plus, there are bugs:
1. When I pressed "stop" on a video, the video stopped, but the audio continued to playback.
2. When I press "fullscreen" on my dual-screen setup, the full screen video opens up on the first monitor, while my browser is on the second monitor. This does not happen on other video sites: the video should open on the same monitor as the browser exists.

And these problems, after about 40 seconds of using your site. I would like to help out if you want feedback, email me if you do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked out this web site, and I find the 720p resolution of the videos embarrassingly pixelated, sorry. The overall design is not bad, but the re-encoded HD videos are too low on bitrate, the 720p versions stall too easily (it seems that you don&#8217;t use servers with fast pipes), I don&#8217;t see an ability to download the original video (I am using Vimeo as a vessel for people to download my CC-BY videos to re-use them as stock footage you see), plus, there are bugs:<br />
1. When I pressed &#8220;stop&#8221; on a video, the video stopped, but the audio continued to playback.<br />
2. When I press &#8220;fullscreen&#8221; on my dual-screen setup, the full screen video opens up on the first monitor, while my browser is on the second monitor. This does not happen on other video sites: the video should open on the same monitor as the browser exists.</p>
<p>And these problems, after about 40 seconds of using your site. I would like to help out if you want feedback, email me if you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shiv Kumar</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/17/stanford-university-campus-revisited/#comment-6381</link>
		<author>Shiv Kumar</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 07:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/17/stanford-university-campus-revisited/#comment-6381</guid>
		<description>Eugenia,

You should take a look at &lt;a href="http://exposureroom.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;ExposureRoom&lt;/a&gt;
We're currently in beta and will be going live in a month or so.

Some links to look at:
&lt;a href="http://exposureroom.com/members/disjecta.aspx/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Steven Dempsey's ExposureRoom Website&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://exposureroom.com/members/philipbloom.aspx/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Philip Bloom's ExposureRoom Website&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://exposureroom.com/members/n8ture.aspx/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Kevin Railsback's ExposureRoom Website&lt;/a&gt;

and of course
&lt;a href="http://exposureroom.com/members/skumar.aspx/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Shiv's  ExposureRoom Website&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eugenia,</p>
<p>You should take a look at <a href="http://exposureroom.com" rel="nofollow">ExposureRoom</a><br />
We&#8217;re currently in beta and will be going live in a month or so.</p>
<p>Some links to look at:<br />
<a href="http://exposureroom.com/members/disjecta.aspx/" rel="nofollow">Steven Dempsey&#8217;s ExposureRoom Website</a><br />
<a href="http://exposureroom.com/members/philipbloom.aspx/" rel="nofollow">Philip Bloom&#8217;s ExposureRoom Website</a><br />
<a href="http://exposureroom.com/members/n8ture.aspx/" rel="nofollow">Kevin Railsback&#8217;s ExposureRoom Website</a></p>
<p>and of course<br />
<a href="http://exposureroom.com/members/skumar.aspx/" rel="nofollow">Shiv&#8217;s  ExposureRoom Website</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
