<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The relativity of things</title>
	<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/07/the-relativity-of-things/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Eugenia</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/07/the-relativity-of-things/#comment-6226</link>
		<author>Eugenia</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 18:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/07/the-relativity-of-things/#comment-6226</guid>
		<description>Don't assume things mister. Just because I blog about it now, does not mean that this is the day that I learn about the subject. It's about finding a good example more than anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t assume things mister. Just because I blog about it now, does not mean that this is the day that I learn about the subject. It&#8217;s about finding a good example more than anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l3v1</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/07/the-relativity-of-things/#comment-6224</link>
		<author>l3v1</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/03/07/the-relativity-of-things/#comment-6224</guid>
		<description>"So basically, “what’s best”, or “what’s worse”, is not necessarily judged compared to an abstract generic value, but compared to other concrete values that serve as reference. Everything is relative."

I think you might have just given a whole new meaning to &lt;i&gt;obvious&lt;/i&gt; right there :P It's just not clear whether the reason for this is that this episode's rating got lower than you wished it were and an explanation became a necessity :) Other than that, that rating seems quite OK on my scale, which is quite a lot higher than 5 :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So basically, “what’s best”, or “what’s worse”, is not necessarily judged compared to an abstract generic value, but compared to other concrete values that serve as reference. Everything is relative.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you might have just given a whole new meaning to <i>obvious</i> right there <img src='http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> It&#8217;s just not clear whether the reason for this is that this episode&#8217;s rating got lower than you wished it were and an explanation became a necessity <img src='http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Other than that, that rating seems quite OK on my scale, which is quite a lot higher than 5 <img src='http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
