<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new rig</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/11/28/a-new-rig/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/11/28/a-new-rig/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:56:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Forster</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/11/28/a-new-rig/#comment-4908</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Forster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/11/28/a-new-rig/#comment-4908</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s very cool. If I had the money, I&#039;m sure I would have a lot of the same equipment you do. For years I have been interested in various aspects of post. I have the most experience in broadcast graphics, but I have worked with my fair share of live-action, doing corrections and matte and 3d tracking and whatnot. It&#039;s definitely an extension of the geek culture, like you said.

&amp; I would love to see a sample from the 52mm!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s very cool. If I had the money, I&#8217;m sure I would have a lot of the same equipment you do. For years I have been interested in various aspects of post. I have the most experience in broadcast graphics, but I have worked with my fair share of live-action, doing corrections and matte and 3d tracking and whatnot. It&#8217;s definitely an extension of the geek culture, like you said.</p>
<p>&amp; I would love to see a sample from the 52mm!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugenia</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/11/28/a-new-rig/#comment-4906</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugenia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/11/28/a-new-rig/#comment-4906</guid>
		<description>That lens in the picture is mounted on the wrong side (reversed). It is mounted on the place where you add 52mm filters, not the len&#039;s mount to the camera. Using a lens the wrong side up won&#039;t give you the result that you would expect. That&#039;s why this trick can only be used with macro lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That lens in the picture is mounted on the wrong side (reversed). It is mounted on the place where you add 52mm filters, not the len&#8217;s mount to the camera. Using a lens the wrong side up won&#8217;t give you the result that you would expect. That&#8217;s why this trick can only be used with macro lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/11/28/a-new-rig/#comment-4905</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/11/28/a-new-rig/#comment-4905</guid>
		<description>If you can screw a macro lens like that on, why can&#039;t you screw on those other lenses in order to get those great field of depth effects?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can screw a macro lens like that on, why can&#8217;t you screw on those other lenses in order to get those great field of depth effects?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
