No comment

Yahoo vs Google

8 Comments »

Gravatar Icon
mikesum32 wrote on November 4th, 2007 at 12:00 am PST:

An oldie, but goodie.


Gravatar Icon
Dimitar Uzunov wrote on November 4th, 2007 at 5:56 am PST:

I don’t use Yahoo but isn’t it more fair to compare
the yahoo search page with its Google counterpart and iGoogle with the ?


Gravatar Icon
Dimitar Uzunov wrote on November 4th, 2007 at 5:57 am PST:

Something happened to the links.


Gravatar Icon
PhoenixBF wrote on November 4th, 2007 at 7:27 am PST:

“Which means that I won’t be reporting, blogging or commenting on Google and their related technologies from now on.”

LOL :-)
You are not so coherent :-P

btw I dont get the point. That google is more usable? IMHO yes it is, it’s a clean interface: I want search, period.


This is the admin speaking...
Eugenia wrote on November 4th, 2007 at 11:18 am PST:

I said “no comment”.


Gravatar Icon
mikesum32 wrote on November 4th, 2007 at 12:34 pm PST:

I think the picture speaks for itself(and for Eugenia by proxy).


Gravatar Icon
l3v1 wrote on November 6th, 2007 at 3:54 am PST:

Uhmm, whatever the pages, firefox’s [substitute your favourite] search box doesn’t have any unnecessary contents. Meaning the default site content doesn’t matter much these days since you can initiate the searches from wherever else.


Gravatar Icon
chema wrote on November 7th, 2007 at 1:51 pm PST:

@Dimitar Uzuno: Considering those are the “default url’s” of both, not at all.

Why yahoo??? why??? oh well, as l3v1 points out, now i mostly use that search box, still using google tho.


Comments are closed as this blog post is now archived.

Lines, paragraphs break automatically. HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

The URI to TrackBack this blog entry is this. And here is the RSS 2.0 for comments on this post.

website page counter