Comments on: Understanding ‘Intermediate’ and ‘Delivery’ video formats http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/10/19/understanding-intermediate-and-delivery-video-formats/ Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:08:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 By: Richard http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/10/19/understanding-intermediate-and-delivery-video-formats/#comment-4419 Richard Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:25:00 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/10/19/understanding-intermediate-and-delivery-video-formats/#comment-4419 It is, although I am under the impression that they changed it slightly so it is not compatible with other huffyuv variants, I did not test that though. It is, although I am under the impression that they changed it slightly so it is not compatible with other huffyuv variants, I did not test that though.

]]> By: Eugenia http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/10/19/understanding-intermediate-and-delivery-video-formats/#comment-4418 Eugenia Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:06:30 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/10/19/understanding-intermediate-and-delivery-video-formats/#comment-4418 I don't know about the v1, but the ffvhuff is nothing but the Huffyuv codec I mention above. I don’t know about the v1, but the ffvhuff is nothing but the Huffyuv codec I mention above.

]]> By: Richard http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/10/19/understanding-intermediate-and-delivery-video-formats/#comment-4417 Richard Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:40:59 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/10/19/understanding-intermediate-and-delivery-video-formats/#comment-4417 I was referring to the ffv1 and ffvhuff codecs, that are SPECIFIC to ffmpeg, and my intention was to think about them in terms of performance and potential, and not necessarily as ready usable solutions. ;-) I was referring to the ffv1 and ffvhuff codecs, that are SPECIFIC to ffmpeg, and my intention was to think about them in terms of performance and potential, and not necessarily as ready usable solutions. ;-)

]]> By: Eugenia http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/10/19/understanding-intermediate-and-delivery-video-formats/#comment-4416 Eugenia Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:25:19 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/10/19/understanding-intermediate-and-delivery-video-formats/#comment-4416 >ffmpeg has a number of lossless codecs Nope, I didn't find any other that was supported by NLEs too. It won't support Cineform for example, neither Lagarith, I tried. Huffyuv was the only one that went smooth. MJPEG is not lossless btw, if that's what you are thinking. >ffmpeg has a number of lossless codecs

Nope, I didn’t find any other that was supported by NLEs too. It won’t support Cineform for example, neither Lagarith, I tried. Huffyuv was the only one that went smooth. MJPEG is not lossless btw, if that’s what you are thinking.

]]> By: Richard http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/10/19/understanding-intermediate-and-delivery-video-formats/#comment-4412 Richard Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:02:45 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/10/19/understanding-intermediate-and-delivery-video-formats/#comment-4412 ffmpeg has a number of lossless codecs, that might be interesting, and they are potentially useable in windows apps through the directshow-filter ffdshow. I wonder how they perform in terms of compression rate and cpu load. ffmpeg has a number of lossless codecs, that might be interesting, and they are potentially useable in windows apps through the directshow-filter ffdshow. I wonder how they perform in terms of compression rate and cpu load.

]]>