Comments on: RAW support on my Canon A700 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/09/11/raw-support-on-my-canon-a700/ Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:13:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 By: Eugenia http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/09/11/raw-support-on-my-canon-a700/#comment-3989 Eugenia Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:07:21 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/09/11/raw-support-on-my-canon-a700/#comment-3989 I have none... I don't really follow much the camera scene. I mostly do so in the camcorder world... However, looking at that model, I don't take it seriously: no viewfinder, small lens... I have none… I don’t really follow much the camera scene. I mostly do so in the camcorder world… However, looking at that model, I don’t take it seriously: no viewfinder, small lens…

]]> By: Imran http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/09/11/raw-support-on-my-canon-a700/#comment-3987 Imran Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:17:49 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/09/11/raw-support-on-my-canon-a700/#comment-3987 Eugenia, what is your opinion on, Sony Cyber Shot T-100? Eugenia, what is your opinion on, Sony Cyber Shot T-100?

]]> By: peejay http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/09/11/raw-support-on-my-canon-a700/#comment-3967 peejay Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:27:55 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/09/11/raw-support-on-my-canon-a700/#comment-3967 > If your Canon DIGIC II-based camera is supported, feel free to use the CHDK hack. Darn, I have the Powershot S1. Time to start thinking about an upgrade, I guess. ;) > If your Canon DIGIC II-based camera is supported, feel free to use the CHDK hack.

Darn, I have the Powershot S1. Time to start thinking about an upgrade, I guess. ;)

]]> By: Eugenia http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/09/11/raw-support-on-my-canon-a700/#comment-3966 Eugenia Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:56:38 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/09/11/raw-support-on-my-canon-a700/#comment-3966 RAW is good enough (and smaller in filesize), plus most cameras don't capture TIFF, so it doesn't matter. It only matters if you want to edit later your RAW pictures with an app that can't read RAW, in which case you want to be saving to the intermediate .tiff uncompressed. Other than that, RAW will do the job fine. RAW is good enough (and smaller in filesize), plus most cameras don’t capture TIFF, so it doesn’t matter. It only matters if you want to edit later your RAW pictures with an app that can’t read RAW, in which case you want to be saving to the intermediate .tiff uncompressed. Other than that, RAW will do the job fine.

]]> By: mikesum32 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/09/11/raw-support-on-my-canon-a700/#comment-3965 mikesum32 Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:48:04 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/09/11/raw-support-on-my-canon-a700/#comment-3965 OMG DMCA ! Call da FBI !1! Raw vs jpeg ? Meh. What about raw vs tiff ? OMG DMCA ! Call da FBI !1!

Raw vs jpeg ? Meh. What about raw vs tiff ?

]]>