<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nokia E65 vs E61</title>
	<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/02/28/nokia-e65-vs-e61/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Eugenia</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/02/28/nokia-e65-vs-e61/#comment-1537</link>
		<author>Eugenia</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/02/28/nokia-e65-vs-e61/#comment-1537</guid>
		<description> Ah, I c. Thanks for letting me know, I really thought it was S40.
	
However, I still don&#8217;t like the 6110, because it does not have VoIP+Wifi. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I c. Thanks for letting me know, I really thought it was S40.</p>
<p>However, I still don&#8217;t like the 6110, because it does not have VoIP+Wifi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Constantinescu</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/02/28/nokia-e65-vs-e61/#comment-1534</link>
		<author>Stefan Constantinescu</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/02/28/nokia-e65-vs-e61/#comment-1534</guid>
		<description> Why not go with the E61i?
	
Or how about the 6110 Navigator which has the same specs as the E65 + GPS?
	
I plan to write a blog post about that. E65 vs 6110. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not go with the E61i?</p>
<p>Or how about the 6110 Navigator which has the same specs as the E65 + GPS?</p>
<p>I plan to write a blog post about that. E65 vs 6110.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  Agnwstos</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/02/28/nokia-e65-vs-e61/#comment-1536</link>
		<author> Agnwstos</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 08:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/02/28/nokia-e65-vs-e61/#comment-1536</guid>
		<description> Eugenia, you are wrong&#8230; The &lt;a href="http://www.forum.nokia.com/devices/6110_Navigator" rel="nofollow"&gt;Nokia 6110 Navigator&lt;/a&gt; is a S60 3rd Edition, with Feature Pack 1&#8230;
	
Anyway, I vote for the ultimate enterprise device, the E90&#8230; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eugenia, you are wrong&#8230; The <a href="http://www.forum.nokia.com/devices/6110_Navigator" rel="nofollow">Nokia 6110 Navigator</a> is a S60 3rd Edition, with Feature Pack 1&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, I vote for the ultimate enterprise device, the E90&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  Eugenia</title>
		<link>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/02/28/nokia-e65-vs-e61/#comment-1535</link>
		<author> Eugenia</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 04:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/02/28/nokia-e65-vs-e61/#comment-1535</guid>
		<description> Stefan, the 6110 is NOT a smartphone. It is based on the S40 platform, not the S60. For me, feature phones don&#8217;t hold a candle compared to smartphones. They are just not interesting.
	
The E61i is indeed a better choice. It is E61+camera, in reality. And that&#8217;s good. But stay away from the S40 phones if you are a power user. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan, the 6110 is NOT a smartphone. It is based on the S40 platform, not the S60. For me, feature phones don&#8217;t hold a candle compared to smartphones. They are just not interesting.</p>
<p>The E61i is indeed a better choice. It is E61+camera, in reality. And that&#8217;s good. But stay away from the S40 phones if you are a power user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
