http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/02/13/groklaw-filthy/ Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:01:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/02/13/groklaw-filthy/#comment-1637 Phil Sat, 17 Feb 2007 08:45:00 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/02/13/groklaw-filthy/#comment-1637 Groklaw has had to deal with the reality of a firm that tried to destroy Linux by any means possible. It is not that Groklaw is “ultra-biased” it is that it is a black and white case of right and wrong. Groklaw has had to deal with the reality of a firm that tried to destroy Linux by any means possible. It is not that Groklaw is “ultra-biased” it is that it is a black and white case of right and wrong.

]]> http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/02/13/groklaw-filthy/#comment-1636 mikesum32 Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:50:00 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/02/13/groklaw-filthy/#comment-1636 It should be pointed out that SCO, as a rule, hurls unfounded rumors and frivolous lawsuits, like owning linux. It should be pointed out that SCO, as a rule, hurls unfounded rumors and frivolous lawsuits, like owning linux.

]]> http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/02/13/groklaw-filthy/#comment-1635 memson Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:21:00 +0000 http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/02/13/groklaw-filthy/#comment-1635 Vey interesting. I was only reading some biased BS by her in a UK Linux magazine last night. Notably, there was no real picture of her - only a drawing. Odd I thought. All other contributers has a photograph… Vey interesting. I was only reading some biased BS by her in a UK Linux magazine last night. Notably, there was no real picture of her - only a drawing. Odd I thought. All other contributers has a photograph…

]]>